.
International Journal of Rural Psychology
 Title
Stress and Life Events as a Function of Place of Residence

 Author Details

Suzanne McLaren
Lisa M. Hopes
Belinda A. Jude
Helen N. T. Poon
School of Behavioural & Social Sciences & HumanitiesUniversity of Ballarat, Australia

Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant from the School of Behavioural & Social Sciences & Humanities, University of Ballarat.
 

Correct Reference
McLaren, S., Hopes, L., Jude, B., & Poon, H.  (2000) , Stress and Life Events as a Function of Place of Residence, International Journal Journal of Rural Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 11, URL
http://www.ruralpsych.com/Members/RefereedArticles/RR-McLaren-Hopes-Jude-Poon.htm
Address for correspondence
Dr Suzanne McLaren
School of Behavioural & Social Sciences & Humanities
University of Ballarat
University Drive
Mt Helen Vic 3353
Australia
Telephone: (03) 53279628
Fax: (03) 53279754
E-mail: s.mclaren@ballarat.edu.au


Abstract
Research has identified the mental health of rural residents to be of concern.  Despite fairly extensive research regarding physical and general mental health, there is a paucity of research focused specifically on stress.  Contrary to reports in the United States, the paucity of Australian research has shown that the experience of perceived stress does not differ as a function of residence.  The present study extended previous research by examining whether the experience of perceived stress, and positive and negative life events varies with location of residence.  Six hundred and fifty five residents in Victoria, Australia, completed the List of Recent Experiences (Headey, Holmstrom, & Wearing, 1984) and the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983).  The respondents were divided into four groups by their location of residence: urban (n = 146), regional city (n = 164), regional town (n = 174) and rural (n = 171).  Respondents’ ages ranged from 17 to 88.  Overall no rural-urban differences were demonstrated in either levels of stress or sources of stress.  It may be more appropriate to examine other demographic divisions such as socioeconomic status, than making comparisons between population density divisions.

 Recently, researchers and mental health workers have begun to question the existence of an ideal rural life style (Hoyt, Conger, & Valde, 1997).  Evidence of higher incidence of poorer physical health (Hays & Zouari, 1995; Johnson, 1998), psychiatric illness (Mumford, Saeed, Ahmad, Latif, & Mubbashar, 1997; Wagenfeld, 1982), depression (Beeson & Johnson, 1987; Cheng, Soong, Chong, & Lin, 1995; Hays & Zouari, 1995; Zimbelman, 1987), alcohol dependence and abuse (Lee et al., 1990) and suicide (Dudley, Waters, Kelk, & Howard, 1992; Lohse, 1992; Pritchard, 1992) negates the perception that rural life is free from the stresses of city life.  Indeed, elevated levels of stress have been noted in rural residents (Hays & Zouari, 1995; Johnson, 1998) and have been identified as a significant problem (Jacob, Bourke, & Luloff, 1997).

Much rural research was instigated by the economic downturn in the 1980s, and has examined the direct effects of economic hardship in rural areas.  This research has consistently demonstrated that economic hardship ‘on the farm’ is associated with increased psychological distress and dysfunction (Armstrong & Schulman, 1990; Beeson & Johnson, 1987; Belyea & Lobao,  1990).

In many respects, the farm crisis served to accelerate a continual population decline and many agriculture-dependent businesses were forced to close down (Davidson, 1989; O’Hare, 1988).  The resulting lack of opportunities in rural industry accelerated the exodus of the younger and, in many instances, the more economically viable and educated segment of the population to urban centres.  The migration of youth not only decreased local populations in absolute terms, it also left rural populations disproportionately elderly (Johnson & Beale, 1992).  These changes in size and composition of the population base resulted in the loss of traditional formal support systems such as community organisations, schools and hospitals, into larger, relatively distant regional population centres (Quevillon & Trenerry, 1983; Stewart, McKenry, Rudd, & Gavazzi, 1994; Sullivan, Weinert, & Fulton, 1993).

These economic and demographic changes have fostered conditions that have diminished the effectiveness of traditional community-level buffers and undermined individual defense mechanisms.  Rural residents have reported increasing perceptions of community decline and lowering of work satisfaction, expressed as diminished satisfaction with community life and lessened feelings of cohesion (Naples, 1994; Oberlander, 1990).  These perceptions contribute to expressions of social isolation and hopelessness that are likely to decrease an individual’s sense of control.  Given the key role that these types of psychological resources have in buffering the impact of crises (Mirowsky & Ross, 1989), this situation is likely to translate into increased distress at the individual level.

Perceived stress is a global measure that examines the degree to which non-specific situations in an individual’s life are appraised as stressful (Cohen, Evans, Stokols, & Kranz, 1986).  This appraisal of stress is expected to be sensitive to ongoing life circumstances, to stress resulting from events occurring in lives of friends and relatives, changes in coping resources and to expectations concerning future events.  In assessing stress, it takes into account unidentified stress not listed on life-event and hassle scales (Blankstein & Flett, 1992; Blankstein, Flett, & Koledin, 1991).  With only general beliefs being measured, participants are not provided with a list of experimenter-generated specific life events or chronic strains.  Consequently, results are unlikely to be biased by the event content or by the differential recall of past life experiences.

When reviewing the literature on rural-urban differences in perceived stress, mixed results are evident.  Farm residents living in Manitoba, Canada reported significantly higher chronic fatigue, forgetfulness, loss of temper, concentration difficulties, back pain, and sleep disruptions (all commonly associated with chronic stress) than did non-farmers (Walker & Walker, 1988). In Tunisia, research based on forty-five women living in three distinct environments (rural, mid-size village and the capital city of Tunis), found rural Bedouin women to have greater stress levels and depressive symptoms than the village and/or urban women (Hays & Zouari, 1995).

It should be noted however, that numerous studies have found that physical expression of psychic distress, varies with education, socioeconomic status, age, gender and ethnic groups that discourage the direct expression of emotion (Barsky & Klerman, 1983; Bell, Leroy, & Stephenson, 1982;  Clarke & Jensen, 1997; Dean & Ensel, 1982; Johnson, 1998; Kessler, Price, & Wortman, 1985; Taylor, Henderson, & Jackson, 1991).  Urban-rural differences in stress therefore, may be confounded by other demographic factors (Bell, Leroy, Lin, & Schwab, 1981; Linn, Husaini, Whitten-Stovall, & Broomes, 1989; Mueller, 1981; Neff & Husaini, 1987; Neff, Husaini, & McCorkel, 1980; Romans, Walton, Herbison, & Mullen, 1992).

In addition to examining perceived stress, researchers have focused on the experience of life events.  After two decades of research, evidence supports the contention that life events are associated with a wide variety of physical and psychiatric disorders, including heart disease, fractures, schizophrenic episodes, anxiety, and depressive reactions (Dohrenwend & Dohrenwend, 1981; Kessler et al., 1985; Selye, 1982; Thoits, 1983).

Life events are discrete and major changes that may be outside of an individual’s control (Selye, 1982).  Events may include, death of a loved one, a life-threatening or incapacitating illness or being unemployed.  It could also be an event heavily influenced by the person to whom it happens, such as in divorce, giving birth or taking an important examination.  Both positive and negative changes, such as marriage and divorce, are considered to be stressful by Holmes and Rahe (1967) because they all demand adjustments by the individual to a new lifestyle or pattern and may consequently affect mental health (Harpham, 1994).

When comparing the experience of life events as a function of residence, epidemiological surveys of samples from the south-eastern United States demonstrated that rural residents report more life events than urban residents (Linn et al., 1989; Neff & Husaini, 1987).  In another study conducted in the United States, adolescents across four rural counties reported experiencing more negative life events (Stewart et al., 1994) than the normative data collected by McCubbin and colleagues (McCubbin, Patterson, Bauman, & Harris, 1985).

Whereas some studies associate the experience of stress with place of residence, more recent studies suggest there is no difference in the types (Thomas & Groer, 1986) and levels of psychological distress in urban and rural communities (Horwell & McLaren, 2000; Hoyt, Odonnell, & Mack, 1995; Zitzow, 1992).  Further, there are some studies (Harpham, 1994; Hays & Zouari, 1995) which suggest that any differences in stress levels, depression and mental disorders, were attributable to poverty and perceived financial status rather than the influence of a specific geographic location.

In summary, people experience stress regardless of their place of residence.  Research has examined the levels of stress and the number of life events experienced by rural and urban residents.  Little research has investigated whether the types of life events experienced differ as a function of residence.  One study, based on a community sample of 420 residents in Montana, indicated greater financial and business stress for rural respondents and greater work and family stress for the urban respondents (Marotz-Baden & Colvin, 1986).

Overall, the review of rural-urban differences in stress failed to show any consistency and comparison was, in any case, difficult due to use of different types of data, definitions and methods.  A weakness of many studies which compared residence is that compositional differences (e.g. age, gender, education) between urban and rural areas are not taken into account.  Participants studied had different ethnic background, age, sex, education, income, occupation, and mobility which may affect mental health more than place of residence.  If urban or rural residence is a risk factor for psychiatric morbidity, that relationship should be observed with statistically controlled compositional differences between urban and rural areas (Crowell, George, Blazer, & Landerman, 1986).

The current study investigated the experience of perceived stress and life events in a community sample of Australian residents.  It was hypothesised that rural residents would report higher levels of perceived stress and more negative life events than urban residents.  It was also expected that the life events reported would differ as a function of residential location, though the paucity of research examining this issue did not allow a precise hypothesis to be formulated.

Method

Participants
A total of 655 community members from the state of Victoria, Australia, participated in the study (22% response rate).  The sample comprised of 58% females (n = 379) and 42 % males (n = 276).  The respondents were divided into four groups by their location of residence: urban (n = 146), regional city (n = 164), regional town (n = 174) and rural (n = 171).  Average age of the sample was 42.71 years (SD = 13.42).  The demographic details for males and females for each of the residential groups can be seen in Table 1.

2.2 Materials
A questionnaire package consisting of a covering letter, a demographic page, the List of Recent Experiences (Headey, Holmstrom, & Wearing, 1984), and the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983) was used.
The demographics section of the research questionnaire requested information from participants regarding their age, gender, marital status, postcode, and highest level of education achieved.

The List of Recent Experiences (Headey et al., 1984) was used to assess the number and type of life events experienced by the respondents.  It is a self-administered questionnaire containing a list of 44 events (both positive and negative) to which participants respond by checking those events that they have experienced during the past twelve months.  The List of Recent Experiences contains items that can be divided into nine categories: financial and work situation; illness, injury and accident; relationships; recreation; study and schooling; loss and bereavement; friendships; personal and civil assault; and religion.  The reliability of the scale appears satisfactory.  A test-retest reliability of r = .89 has been reported after two weeks (Henderson, Byrne, & Duncun-Jones, 1981).

The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) assesses the subjective experience of stress.  The 14-item scale measures the cognitive and affective outcomes of all factors that contribute to the experience of stress, including objective environmental events, subjective appraisals, personality factors, coping ability and other resources.  Responses are given on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from never to very often.  The Perceived Stress Scale has been found to have adequate internal and test-retest reliability, with alpha coefficients ranging between r = .84 and r = .86 (Cohen et al., 1983).  In their initial validation research, Cohen et al. (1983) found small to moderate correlations between the Perceived Stress Scale and life events scales (r = .17 to r = .49) and fairly strong correlations with measures of physical symptomatology (r = .52 to r = .70) and depression (r = .65 to r = .76).  In a 2-month prospective study, Cohen et al. (1986) found the Perceived Stress Scale predicted physical and psychological symptoms even after symptoms at Time 1 were removed.

Procedure
Selection of participants followed a stratified random sampling procedure (Shaughnessy & Zechmeister, 1990).  Rather than utilising two groups of participants (rural, metropolitan), the state of Victoria was divided into four strata: urban (the capital city of Melbourne; postcodes 3000-3200); regional cities (Ballarat, Bendigo, and Geelong; population above 50,000); regional towns (population from 7,500 to 50,000); and rural (open country farm and non-farm settings of fewer than 2,500 people) (Dwyer, Barton, & Vogel, 1994).

Randomly selected postcodes for all four strata were generated.  Postcodes were then supplied to the Listbank Company, which generated random mailing lists from Electoral Rolls.  The details of the procedure were as follows.  For the urban region, 30 questionnaire packages were distributed to each of the 25 randomly selected ‘urban’ postcodes.  For the regional cities, 250 questionnaire packages were distributed to the ‘regional city’ postcodes of Ballarat, Bendigo and Geelong.  For the regional towns, all 20 ‘regional town’ postcodes were included.  Out of the twenty towns, 42 questionnaire packages were distributed to the two most populated towns, and 37 questionnaire packages were delivered to each of the remaining eighteen towns.  For the rural region, one postcode was generated per 6,000 residents per shire, and 15 questionnaire packages were distributed to each of the 50 randomly selected postcodes.  A total of 3,000 questionnaire packs were posted to a random sample of Australians- 750 urban, 750 regional cities, 750 regional towns and 750 rural residents. Questionnaire presentations were randomly ordered to counterbalance possible carry-over effects (Shaughnessy & Zechmeister, 1994).

Results
A two-tailed alpha level of .05 was used.  For all statistical tests, Levene’s test for equality of variance showed no significant differences between variances of stress scores, and evaluations of the assumptions of normality, linearity, homogeneity and sphericity were satisfactory (Tabachnick & Fidell, 1996).

Reliability
In order to assess the reliability of the Perceived Stress Scale for this sample, Cronbach correlation coefficients for internal consistency were calculated (Tabachnick & Fidell, 1996). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient obtained r = .89, which was consistent with Cohen and colleagues (1983), who reported alpha coefficients ranging between r = .84 and r = .86.  Results indicated that the Perceived Stress Scale had adequate internal consistency for this sample.

The internal consistency of the List of Recent Experiences was not calculated, as experiencing a particular life event (e.g. you had a major financial crisis) does not necessarily relate to the experience of another life event (e.g. a child of yours died).

Initial Analyses
The order of presentation for the questionnaires did not appear to influence the participants’ way of response, F (12, 1712.09) = 1.11.

The demographic characteristics of the four residential groups were compared.  Results indicated that the number of males and females in each group were similar, Pearson ?2 (3, N = 655) = 2.96, Cramérs V = .07.  There was no difference in age across the four groups, F(3, 645) = 0.53.  It was evident that participants in the more rural settings (rural and regional town) were more likely to be married, Pearson ?2 (3, N = 655) = 41.05, Cramérs V = .15, and to have left formal education earlier than those in the more urban regions (urban and regional city), Pearson ?2 (3, N = 655) = 39.06, Cramérs V = .14.  As both marital status (Cotton, 1999; Grove & Stoll, 1999; Hope, Power, & Rodgers, 1999; Simon & Marcussen, 1999) and level of education (Clarke & Jensen, 1997; Johnson, 1998; Taylor et al., 1991), have been related to the experience of stress, both of these variables were entered as covariates in the subsequent analyses.
Rural-Regional-Urban Comparisons

The mean number of positive life events reported by the residents in each group can be seen in Table 2.  After controlling for marital status and education level, a two-way multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was conducted on the number of positive life events reported by males and females in each of the four residential groups.  Results demonstrated a main effect for gender, F(7, 636) = 2.81.  Univariate analyses indicated that females reported significantly more positive studying/schooling events, F(1,636) = 6.00, positive friendship events, F(1, 636) = 11.69, and positive religious events, F(1, 636) = 4.53.  Results did not evidence a significant main effect for place of residence, F(7, 636) = 1.03, nor an interaction between gender and place of residence, F(21, 1826.80) = 0.63.

A second MANCOVA was conducted to test for differences in the mean number of negative life events reported by males and females in the residential groups.  The means can be seen in Table 3.  Results did not demonstrate a main effect for gender, F(10, 633) = 1.14, place of residence, F(10, 633) = 1.16, nor an interaction between the two factors, F(30, 1858.66) = 1.28.

An ANCOVA was used to test for differences in perceived stress between males and females across the four residential locations.  Mean stress scores are included in Table 4.  Results did not indicate a difference in perceived stress as a function of gender, F(1, 642) = 2.43, place of residence, F(3, 642) = 0.30, or an interaction between the two variables, F(3, 642) = 0.71.

In summary, results did not demonstrate any differences in the experience of stress or life events across the four groups of residents.  Consequently, the four groups of residents were reduced to two groups: Urban (urban and regional city) and Rural (regional town and rural), and the same analyses were repeated.  The two groups of residents did not differ on the number of positive, F(7, 640) = 0.88, or negative life events, F(10, 637) = 0.89, or perceived stress, F(1, 646) = 0.30.  A main effect for gender for the number of positive life events reported was evident, F(7, 640) = 2.82, with females experiencing more positive experiences in the areas of studying/schooling, F(1, 640) = 5.75, friends, F(1, 640) = 12.04, and religion, F(1, 640) = 4.43.  A main effect for gender was not demonstrated for the number of negative life events, F(10, 637) = 1.16, or for perceived stress, F(1, 646) = 2.64.  An interaction between place of residence and gender was not shown for positive life events, F(7, 640) = 0.65, negative life events, F(10, 637) = 0.67, or perceived stress, F(1, 646) = 0.01.

In summary, the reporting of perceived stress and life events does not differ as a function of place of residence, whether gross or finer categorisations according to population are utilised.

Correlations Between Perceived Stress and Life Events
A series of one-tailed Pearson partial correlations, controlling for marital status and education, were conducted to test the relationship between the experience of positive and negative life events and perceived stress.  Initially, these correlations were conducted on the whole sample, then on each of the four residential groups.  The correlations can be seen in Table 5.

It is evident from Table 5 that moderate positive correlations exist between the experience of negative life events and perceived stress.  The strength of the correlations was similar across the four residential groups.  A significant negative relationship between the experience of positive life events and perceived stress was not demonstrated for any group, although the small correlation for the Regional Town residents approached significance, p = .067.

Discussion
The current research investigated the experience of stress as a function of residence. The hypothesis that rural residents would report higher levels of perceived stress and more negative life events than urban residents was not supported.  Further, results did not demonstrate that the nature of the life events experienced differed as a function of residential location.

The results were inconsistent with studies conducted in Canada (Walker & Walker, 1988), Tunisia (Hays & Zouari, 1995), and the United States of America (Linn et al., 1989; Marotz-Baden & Colvin, 1986; Neff & Husaini, 1987; Stewart et al., 1994) which indicated that the experience of stress and life events is elevated in rural areas.  This inconsistency may be due to cultural differences, where residents in different countries are exposed to different sets of environmental influences and belief systems, or perhaps other confounding variables exist.  Other studies, however, suggest that there is no difference in the types (Thomas & Groer, 1986) and levels of psychological distress experienced by rural and urban residents (Horwell & McLaren, 2000; Hoyt et al., 1995; Zitzow, 1992).   A recent Australian study demonstrated no differences in perceived stress (as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale) reported by ambulance officers living and working in rural or urban areas (Horwell & McLaren, 2000).

Literature suggests that it is possible that rural residents may have under reported their experiences of stress (Buckwalter, Smith, Zevenburgen, & Russel, 1991; Coward, DeWeaver, Schmidt, & Jackson, 1983).  In particular, events they perceive to be minor by nature, as well as those seen as risking privacy and confidentiality, may remain unreported (Nease, 1993).  Thus, rural residents may potentially be at risk for higher experiences of stress than reported in the study.

Review of rural-urban differences in stress, particularly in America, failed to show any consistency, and could be attributed to differences in operational definitions.  Most studies lack a consistent definition of "rural".  In many studies, rural is simply defined as non-metropolitan (Hays & Zouari, 1995; Plunkett, Henry, & Knaub, 1999), in others, the experience of farmers are taken as representative of the entire rural population (Johnson, 1998; Marotz-Baden & Colvin, 1986; Mumford et al., 1997).  With different studies using different population bases to represent "rural", conflicting results will continue to be demonstrated.

The gender differences in the reporting of life events warrant some attention.  The results of this study indicated that females experienced more positive life events, specifically in the areas of schooling/study, friendships, and religion, than males.  Limited data is available on gender differences in positive life events, although one study indicated that females do experience more positive life events than males (Cohen, McGowan, Fooskas, & Rose, 1984).  More research has focused on gender and negative life events, with mixed results being reported.  For example, a study investigating the frequency of stressful life events among male and female athletes demonstrated no difference (Baldwin, Harris, & Chambliss, 1997).  Another study showed that males experience more stressful life changes than females (Sowa & Lustman, 1984).  Other research has indicated that females face more negative life events and social conditions than males (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1994).  A study investigating types of life events in married couples demonstrated that males were more likely to experience negative work and financial events, whereas females were more likely to experience negative family events (Conger, Lorenz, Elder, Simons, & Ge, 1993).  Though not investigated in this study, previous research has also shown that the impact of life events on psychological well-being is greater for females than males (French, Gekoski, & Knox, 1995).  Thus, on the basis of such research, it would have been reasonable to expect gender differences on the negative life events.  The results of the current study, however, indicated no gender differences.  The inconsistent results demonstrated by previous research suggest that sample characteristics may be responsible for the diverse results.  Clear gender differences in the experience of life events appear not to exist.

The current research also demonstrated that the experience of negative life events was significantly related to perceived stress.  This is consistent with previous research that has shown that it is negative life events, and not positive life events, that are related to negative outcomes, including poor psychological well-being (Iwasaki & Smale, 1998), depression (Dixon & Reid, 2000), illness (Sarason, Sarason, Potter, & Antoni, 1985), and injuries (Patterson, Smith, Everett, & Ptacek, 1998).  Research has demonstrated that positive life events impact negatively on health only in participants with low self-esteem (Brown & McGill, 1989).  Conversely, in participants with high self-esteem, positive life events were associated with better health.  The correlations between perceived stress and negative life events were similar across the four residential groups, suggesting that negative life events are not an explanation for poorer health in rural residents.

The results of this study must be considered in light of some limitations.  Stress is a situation-based variable that changes over time, and therefore results may not be interpreted in absolute terms.  Using retrospective self-report instruments may also limit the depth and accuracy of findings.  The cross-sectional design of the study, as well as the relatively low participation rate, should also be regarded as limitations of the current study.  Further, the current study did not assess the length of time participants had resided in their current location.  Future research should include length of residency as a variable.

Future research may benefit from including other measures of the stress process, including cognitive appraisal and coping.  The ways in which one interprets their encounters with the environment and subsequently copes with such encounters may vary in residents from different population bases (Amato, 1993; Heckman, Somlai, Kalichman, Franzoi & Kelly, 1998; Lin & Rogerson, 1995; Wenger, 1995; Wood & Parham, 1990).

In summary, the present study makes several potential contributions to the rural-urban stress literature.  The data offer little support to suggestions that rural groups are more at risk for experiencing stress than urban groups, or vice versa.  The study refutes the American stereotypes regarding the environmental stresses of rural residence.  The cross-sectional design of the study, combined with using statistical techniques to control for the demographic variables of martial status and education, makes it less likely that the results were due to household selection and respondent factors.

There clearly is a need to establish whether or not the rural experience is different.  Mental health professionals can be of most assistance to their clientele when they do not accept blindly the common stereotypes about rural life and its advantages and disadvantages.  The issue is concerned with a search for variables which differentiate rural from metropolitan life and which may have relevance for psychological practice in differentially populated areas.

 References

Amato, P. (1993). Urban-rural differences in helping friends and family members. Social Psychology Quarterly, 4, 249-262.

Armstrong, P., & Schulman, M. (1990). Financial strain and depression among farm operators: The role of perceived economic hardship and personal control. Rural Sociology, 55, 475-493.

Baldwin, D. R., Harris, S. M., & Chambliss, L. N.  (1997).  Stress and illness in adolescence: Issues of race and gender.  Adolescence, 32, 839-853.

Barsky, A., & Klerman, G. (1983). Overview: Hypochondriasis, bodily complaints and somatic styles. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 273-283.

Beeson, P., & Johnson, D. (1987). A panel study of change (1981-1986) in rural mental health status: Effects of the rural crisis. Paper presented at the National Institute of Mental Health Conference on mental health statistics. Denver. CO.

Bell, R., Leroy, J., Lin, E., & Schwab, J. (1981). Change and psychopathology: epidemiologic considerations. Community Mental Health Journal, 17, 203-213.

Bell, R., Leroy, J., & Stephenson, J. (1982). Evaluating the mediating effects of social support upon life events and depressive symptoms. Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 325-340.

Belyea, M., & Lobao, L. (1990). Psychosocial consequences of agricultural transformation: The farm crisis and depression. Rural Sociology, 55, 58-75.

Blankstein, K., & Flett, G. (1992). Specificity in the assessment of daily hassles: Hassles, locus of control, and adjustment in college students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 24, 382-398.

Blankstein, K., Flett, G., & Koledin, S. (1991). The Brief College Student Hassles Scale: Development, validation, and relation with pessimism. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 258-264.

Brown, J. D., & McGill, K. L.  (1989).  The cost of good fortune: When positive life events produce negative health consequences.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1103-1110.

Buckwalter, K., Smith, M., Zevenburgen, P., & Russel, D. (1991). Mental health services of rural elderly outreach programs. Gerontologist, 32, 408-412.

Cheng, A., Soong, W., Chong, M., & Lin, T. (1995). Urbanization, psychosocial stress, and mental illness in Taiwan. In T. Harpham & I. Blues (Eds.), Urbanization and mental health in developing countries (pp.61-72). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

Clarke, D., & Jensen, M. (1997). The effects of social support, life events, and demographic factors on depression among Maori and Europeans in New Zealand rural, town, and urban environments. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 303-323.

Cohen, L. H., McGowan, J., Fooskas, S., & Rose, S.  (1984).  Positive life events and social support and the relationship between life stress and psychological disorder.  American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 567-587.

Cohen, S., Evans, G., Stokols, D., & Kranz, D. (1986). Behavior, Health, and Environmental Stress. New York: Plenum.

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.

Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., Elder, G. H., Simons, R. L., & Ge, X.  (1993).  Husband and wife differences in response to undesirable life events.  Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 71-88.

Cotton, S. R.  (1999).  Marital status and mental health revisited: Examining the importance of risk factors and resources.  Family Relations, 48, 225-233.

Coward, R., DeWeaver, K., Schmidt, F., & Jackson, R. (1983). Distinctive features of rural environments: A frame of reference for mental health practice. International Journal of Mental Health, 12, 3-24.

Crowell, B., George, L., Blazer, D., & Landerman, R. (1986). Psychosocial risk factors and urban/rural differences in the prevalence of major depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 307-314.

Davidson, O. (1989). Broken heartland: The rise of America’s rural ghetto. New York: Free Press.

Dean, A., & Ensel, W. (1982). Modeling social support, life events, competence and depression in the context of age and sex. Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 392-407.

Dixon, W. A., & Reid, J. K.  (2000).  Positive life events as a moderator of stress-related depressive symptoms.  Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 343-347.

Dohrenwend, B., & Dohrenwend, B. (1981). Stressful life events and their context. New York: Neale Watson.

Dudley, M., Waters, B., Kelk, N., & Howard, J. (1992). Youth suicide in New South Wales: Urban-rural trends. The Medical Journal of Australia, 156, 83-88.

Dwyer, J., Barton, A., & Vogel, W. (1994). Area of residence and the risk of institutionalization. Journals of Gerontology: Social Science, 49, S75-S84.

French, S. L., Gekoski, W. L., & Knox, V. J.  (1995).  Gender differences in relating life events and well-being in elderly individuals.  Social Indicators Research, 35, 1-25.

Grove, J. R., & Stoll, O.  (1999).  Performance slumps in sport: Personal resources and perceived stress.  Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 4, 203-214.

Harpham, T. (1994). Urbanization and mental health in developing countries: A research role for social scientists, public health professionals and social psychiatrists. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 233-245.

Hays, P., & Zouari, J. (1995). Stress, coping, and mental health among rural, village, and urban women in Tunisia. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 69-90.

Headey, B., Holmstrom, E., & Wearing, A., (1984). The Impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 17, 211-234.

Heckman, T. G., Somlai, A. M., Kalichman, S. C., Franzoi, S. L., & Kelly, J. A.  (1998).  Psychosocial differences between urban and rural people living with HIV/AIDS.  Journal of Rural Health, 14, 138-145.

Henderson, A., Byrne, D., & Duncun-Jones, P. (1981). Neurosis and the social environment. New York: Academic Press.

Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.

Hope, S., Power, C., & Rodgers, B.  (1999).  Does financial hardship account for elevated psychological distress in lone mothers?  Social Science and Medicine, 49, 1637-1649.

Horwell, C., & McLaren, S.  (2000).  Stress and coping in urban and rural ambulance officers.  International Journal of Rural Psychology, 1, www.ruralpsych.com

Hoyt, D., Conger, R., & Valde, J. (1997). Psychological distress and help seeking in rural America. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 449-470.

Hoyt, D., Odonnell, D., & Mack, K. (1995). Psychological distress and size of place: The epidemiology of rural economic stress. Rural Psychology, 60, 707-720.

Iwasaki, Y., & Smale, B. A.  (1998).  Longitudinal analyses of the relationships among life transitions, chronic health problems, leisure and psychological well-being.  Leisure Sciences, 20, 25-52.

Jacob, S., Bourke, L., & Luloff A. (1997). Rural community stress, distress, and well-being in Pennsylvania. Journal of Rural Studies, 13, 275-288.

Johnson, J. (1998). Stress, social support, and health in frontier elders. Journal of Gerontology Nursing, 24, 29-35.

Johnson, K., & Beale, C. (1992). Natural population decreases in the United States. Rural Development Perspectives, 8, 8-15.

Kessler, R., Price, R., & Wortman, C. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531-572.

Lee, D., Kwok, Y., Yamamoto, J., Rhee, H., Kim, Y., Ham, J., Choi, J., & Lee, Y. (1990). Psychiatric epidemiology in Korea: II. Urban and rural differences. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 178, 247-252.

Lin, G., & Rogerson, P. A.  (1995).  Elderly parents and the geographic availability of their adult children.  Research on Aging, 17, 303-331.

Linn, J., Husaini, B., Whitten-Stovall, R., & Broomes, L. (1989). Community satisfaction, life stress, social support, and mental health in rural and urban southern black communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 78-88.

Lohse, H. (1992). Suicide in isolation. Youth Studies Australia, Autumn, 33-38.

Marotz-Baden, R., & Colvin, P. (1986). Coping strategies: A rural-urban comparison. Family Relations, 35, 281-288.

McCubbin, H. I., Patterson, J. M., Bauman, E., & Harris, L. (1985). Adolescent-family life inventory of life events. In D. H. Olson, J. Portner, & Y. Lavee (Eds.), Family inventories (pp. 43-52). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Family Social Science.

Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. (1989). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Mueller, D. (1981). The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorder: An emerging trend for depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 169, 18-27.

Mumford, D., Saeed, K., Ahmad, I., Latif, S. & Mubbashar, M. (1997). Stress and psychiatric disorders in rural Punjab: A community survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 473-478.

Naples, N. (1994). Contradictions in agrarian ideology: Restructuring gender, race-ethnicity and class. Rural Sociology, 59, 110-135.

Nease, D. E. (1993). Mental health issues in rural settings. Kansas Medicine, 246-248.

Neff, A. N., & Husaini B. A. (1987). Urbanicity, race, and psychological distress. Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 520-536.

Neff, J. A., Husaini, B. A., & McCorkel, J. (1980). Psychiatric and medical problems in rural communities. Social Science and Medicine, 14, 331-336.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S.  (1994).  An interactive model for the emergence of gender differences in depression in adolescence.  Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 519-534.

Oberlander, L. B. (1990). Work satisfaction among community-based mental health service providers: The association between work environment and work satisfaction. Community Mental Health Journal, 26, 517-532.

O’Hare, W. P. (1988). The rise of poverty in rural America: Population trends and public policy (No. 15). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

Patterson, E. L., Smith, R. E., Everett, J. J., & Ptacek, J. T.  (1998).  Psychosocial factors as predictors of ballet injuries: Interactive effects of life stress and social support.  Journal of Sport Behavior, 21, 101-112.

Plunkett, S., Henry, C., & Knaub, P. (1999). Family stressor events, family coping, and adolescent adaptation in the farm and ranch families. Adolescence, 34, 147-169.

Pritchard, C. (1992). Youth suicide and gender in Australia and New Zealand compared with countries in the western world. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 26, 609-617.

Quevillon, R. P., & Trenerry, M. R. (1983). Research on rural depression: Implications of social networks for theory and treatment. International Journal of Mental Health, 12, 45-61.

Romans, S. E., Walton, V. A., Herbison, G. P., & Mullen, P. E. (1992). Social networks and psychiatric morbidity in New Zealand women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 26, 485-492.

Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Potter, E. H., & Antoni, M. H.  (1985).  Life events, social support, and illness.  Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 156-163.

Selye, H. (1982). History and present status of stress concept. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress (pp. 7-17). New York: Free Press.

Simon, R. W., & Marcussen, K.  (1999).  Martial transitions, marital beliefs, and mental health.  Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 40, 111-125.

Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1990). Research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Sowa, C. J., & Lustman, P. J.  (1984).  Gender differences in rating stressful events, depression, and depressive cognition.  Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1334-1337.

Stewart, E., McKenry, P., Rudd, N., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1994). Family processes as mediators of depressive symptomatology among rural adolescents. Family Relations, 43, 38-45.

Sullivan, T., Weinert, C., & Fulton, R. D.  (1993).  Living with cancer: Self-identified needs of rural dwellers.  Family and Community Health, 16, 41-49.

Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

Taylor, J., Henderson, D., & Jackson, B. B. (1991). A holistic model of understanding and predicting depressive symptoms in African-American women. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 306-320.

Thoits, P. (1983). Dimensions of life events that influence psychological distress: An evaluation and synthesis of the literature. In H. B. Kaplin (ed.), Psychological stress (pp. 105-155). New York: Academic Press.

Thomas, S., & Groer, M. (1986). Relationship of demographic, lifestyle, and stress variables to blood pressure in adolescents. Nursing Research, 35, 169-172.

Wagenfeld, M. (1982). Psychopathology in rural areas: Issues and evidence. In P. Keller, & J. Murray (Eds.), Handbook of rural community mental health (pp. 30-44). New York: Human Science Press.

Walker, J. & Walker, L. (1988). Self-reported stress symptoms in farmers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 10-16.

Wenger, G. C.  (1995).  A comparison of urban with rural support networks: Liverpool and North Wales.  Ageing and Society. 15, 59-81.

Wood, J. B., & Parham, I. A.  (1990).  Coping with perceived burden: Ethnic and cultural issues in Alzheimer’s family caregiving.  The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 9, 325-339.

Zimbelman, K. (1987). Locus of control and achievement orientation in rural and metropolitan youth. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 8, 50-55.

Zitzow, D. (1992). Assessing student stress: School adjustment rating by self-report. The School Counselor, 40, 20-23.
 


ISSN 1444-2166
Please Note:
Access the full version of refereed articles, reports and research notes is restricted to members only. Please subscribe to IJRP if you wish to access these.  All other areas have free public access.