Abstract
In the past ten years, attention has been directed towards the provision
of adequate health care delivery in rural Australia, with a particular
emphasis on the need for improved mental health services. The delivery
of effective psychological services is contingent upon the recognition
of the contributing psychosocial factors and the application of appropriate
skills in the management of such issues. However, despite a clear
need for psychological services in the rural domain, there is an obvious
lack of rural psychologists. The practice of rural psychology embodies
challenges that are unique to a distinct rural cultural milieu for which
the psychologist must be adequately prepared. Consideration must
therefore be given to the provision of adequate education and training
of rural psychologists. Additionally, efforts must be directed towards
the improvement of recruitment and retention of psychologists in rural
Australia. Similarly, the deterrents to psychological service utilisation
must be explored and overcome. In order to achieve significant advances
in the field, key strategies must be implemented: collaboration with major
stakeholders (e.g. universities, national health organisations, and rural
psychology practitioners); education of rural communities regarding issues
of mental health; and research of issues pertinent to rural psychology.
Finally, major policy changes in training, standards, and registration,
requiring compulsory training and/or placements in rural psychology, are
proposed to redress the lack of rural psychologists, and improve rural
psychological services.
Introduction
Rural Australia is currently experiencing the effects of unemployment,
poverty, geographic isolation and environmental factors as evidenced through
diverse and widespread economic, social and demographic changes (Australian
Institute of Health and Welfare, 1994; Griffiths, 1996; Humphreys &
Rolley, 1991). In addition to these variables, the rural population
also faces distinctive challenges associated with rural living conditions.
Consequently there is a need for psychological services in rural areas
as residents often experience health issues that are unique in severity,
if not in nature. For example, there is a higher incidence of issues
such as male youth suicide, drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence,
chronic disease, and socio-economic disadvantage in rural Australia (Griffiths,
1996; Harvey & Hodgson, 1995; Yellowlees & Kaushik, 1992).
However, due to a shortage of rural psychologists, the area of mental health
in the rural domain has been predominantly addressed by medical practitioners,
psychiatrists, community health professionals, and the nursing profession.
Although rural mental health has been historically neglected both by researchers
and policy-makers (Blank, Fox, Hargrove & Turner, 1995), it is now
increasingly recognised and has been highlighted as a National Health Priority
Area, in Healthy Horizons 1999-2003 (Australian Health Ministers’ Conference,
1999). Attention is now being directed towards education and training
(Dollard, Shafik, & Court, 2000) as well as recruitment and retention
of psychologists in rural areas. The aim of this paper is to further
explore such issues.
Deterrents to psychological service
utilisation
As Bushy (1994) explains the health care delivery system in rural
settings is considered not only within a framework of availability and
accessibility, but also within the framework of acceptability of services.
A combination of factors contributes to the prevention of potential rural
clients from seeking psychological services. Firstly, as emphasis
is placed on personal privacy, the possibility of being observed accessing
psychological services is a risk of personal invasion that many potential
clients are reluctant to take. Predominantly due to limited education
and understanding of mental illness combined with years of mythology and
misunderstanding, a stigma associated with mental distress has evolved.
This is particularly so in rural communities and consequently potential
clients are fearful of being stigmatised as “mentally unstable” (Human
Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 1993). Also, the issue
of trust of the therapist is a major consideration as clients need to be
assured of confidentiality in an environment where social opportunities
are limited and proximity is inevitable. Additionally, self-reliant attitudes
raise a barrier to help seeking (Sargent & Gregory, 1980). Rolley
and Humphreys (1993) explain that, in part due to the historical precedent
of having to make do, local residents experience a strong sense of self-sufficiency
and survival in the face of great odds and consequently are reluctant to
seek help. Furthermore, rural expectations of psychology and the
psychologist’s role have an impact on utilisation of psychological services
(Sears, Evan & Perry, 1998). Rural residents appear to have only limited
knowledge of what psychologists do. Knowledge is mainly based on
popular stereotypes, the media and a small number of direct and indirect
personal experience painting a rather narrow and “clinical” picture of
psychological services (Griffiths, 1996). In addition, unsatisfactory encounters
with under-trained counsellors may lead to unfavourable generalisations
about the psychology profession. Dunn (1996) explains that as a consequence
the community may undervalue some non-medical services and thus services
associated with mental health become stripped of their legitimacy.
Other deterrents to the utilisation of psychological services include:
travel issues (distance may be 200-1000 km round trip, lack of public transport);
environmental issues (extreme weather changes, limited times for travel
due to seasonal work, such as planting, harvesting); insufficient number
of psychologists providing outreach services; and, financial concerns (lack
of Medicare entitlements); and culture (strong cultural identity may foster
mistrust of the profession).
There is a demand for health services among rural residents but it
is unclear as to whether such a demand extends to psychological services
(Dunn, 1996). Since rural communities are either misinformed or not
fully aware of the contributions offered by psychological services (Dunn,
Buchanan & Kerr, 1994 cited in Dunn, 1996) they do not feature in the
priority services list endorsed by the rural sector. Of more perceived
importance to the rural community are general health services such as the
local hospital, home carer, community nurse, ambulance and the Flying Doctor
Service. Yuen, Gerdes and Gonzales’ (1996) study indicated that GPs
are the most frequently consulted professionals for mental health care
provision. However, the study identified, that this was the consequence
of a lack of professionals who are experts in the field. The study
further indicated that where GPs had strong linkages with mental health
service providers, the services were indeed utilised – perhaps reflecting
the GP’s acknowledgement of the expertise and utility of mental health
care providers. General practitioners in particular have identified
a need for greater psychiatric and psychological services in rural Australia
(Welch, 1994, cited in Dunn, 1996).
Responding to the challenges
for psychology in rural Australia
Amongst the greatest challenges of rural psychology is educating
communities in order to reduce the stigma and misinformation regarding
mental illness and to increase the awareness and usefulness of the role
of the psychologist. This can be achieved through the dissemination
of information on the types and effects of mental disorders, prevalence
in the community, treatment methods and prevention strategies (Bushy, 1994;
Commonwealth of Australia, 1993). Opportunities for this education
need to be creatively seized. Local events such as field days, show
days or specific festivals can provide the psychologist with exposure to
a cross-section of the rural population, and the opportunity to demonstrate
products or present educational materials about psychologists and the focus
of their work. Also of importance is the issue of confidentiality
and privacy as aforementioned. To this end psychological services
are best provided at a multi-functional health care centre (Griffiths,
1996). In addition, psychologists must be prepared to meet with clients
at other venues, if requested. Moreover, being confronted by clients
after hours is inevitable and, as such the psychologist needs to be sensitive
to the client’s request for confidentiality. The issue of dual relationship
problems for psychologists in rural communities has been discussed at length,
and this concerns the conflict arising from providing a confidential psychological
service, as well as being a member of the local community (see Wilson-Barratt
& Dollard, in press).
Education regarding the contribution of psychology, could also be
provided to health professionals who can be made aware of the importance
of referral to psychological services. In addition, since primary
care workers are often called upon to deal with people with mental health
problems, educational programs for primary health care professionals need
to ensure adequate coverage of mental health treatment issues (Commonwealth
of Australia, 1993). Consequently, where feasible, health professionals
(such as GPs and nursing staff) can be trained by the psychologist in the
provision of basic psychological interventions, such as simple counselling
and behavioural techniques in order to improve the standard of mental health
care (Sears, Evans & Perry, 1998). Moreover, there is a lack of adequate
knowledge on the part of general practitioners in regard to psychological
assessment and psychological testing, which is frequently requested.
Consequently there is a need for further education in this area.
The psychologist in rural and remote areas is also faced with providing
consultative services to other health professionals both in government
and non-government organisations, when they take on a case management role.
To this end the psychologist must provide a supportive and educational
role in providing a psychological resource to others.
In response to the issue of consumer demands for rural psychologists,
Dunn (1996) proposes that psychologists should aim to clearly define their
role in relation to the other professions in order to highlight psychology’s
unique contributions. In addition, a proactive role is required so
that psychologists can secure a substantive position in the development
and implementation of national health policy. Psychologists can play
a vital role in for example mental health promotion, prevention and early
intervention strategies, and particularly in the recognition of rural residents
“at risk". They can also inform policy and strategies which guide
the provision of appropriate rural health services and particularly address
the calls for priority to rural mental health (Australian Health Ministers'
Conference, 1999). Finally, given the need for psychological services,
it is anticipated that the discipline of psychology would assume an active
stance in ensuring an adequate supply of qualified psychologists to rural
areas.
Equally important is the psychologist’s own local knowledge of the
remote locality and familiarity with rural issues. Incompetence in
any of these areas may result in a view of the psychologist as being ill-equipped
to meet local needs as well as in mistrust of intentions and consequently,
suspiciousness of the contribution of psychology (Griffiths, 1996).
It remains the psychologists’ responsibility to ensure they are well prepared
and informed or at least able to access necessary local information for
the appropriate provision of services. A rural psychologist will
need to become active in the community, for example, by sitting on appropriate
committees, to develop a sense of belonging to the community.
Psychologists who live and practice in rural and remote Australia
are faced with unique ethical issues that are not ordinarily encountered
by their urban counterparts. These issues reflect ethical dilemmas
involving professional boundaries – the reality of overlapping social relationships
and the effects of these relationships on members of the psychologist’s
own family, and the possibility of working with more than one family member
as clients or with others who have friendships with individual clients
(Faulkner & Faulkner, 1997). Schank and Skovholt (1997) suggest
that ongoing discussions between colleagues regarding these issues can
contribute to the evolution of practice codes applicable to rural areas
and other small communities.
It appears impossible for psychologists in rural Australia to provide
a purely clinical service to local residents. Lichte (1996) explains
that this is due to the small size of the mental health service, the lack
of alternative services (such as specialist services, crisis intervention
teams, after hours or psychiatric rehabilitation services) and the unwillingness
of clients to travel to the nearest city. Consequently, the psychologist
is expected to have a broad skills base as he/she becomes relied upon to
provide such services as relationship counselling, counselling for sexual
assault / domestic violence, critical incident management and child behaviour
modification (Court & Dollard, 2000). In short, the psychologist
must become equally comfortable with providing services to a diverse population
(for example in the elderly, adolescents, Aboriginal clients) with varied
clinical and non-clinical concerns (Harvey & Hodgson, 1995).
Furthermore, the rural psychologist may need to undertake various
other tasks that are time-consuming, such as arranging for the hospitalisation
of psychologically unwell clients when community based treatment is not
possible, or travelling to more remote areas if the clients are unwilling/unable
to travel. In addition, as Bushy (1994) explains “professionals in
rural practice settings often must assume multiple roles to function in
a variety of situations” (p.258) and, consequently, the role of the psychologist
includes the wearing of other hats such as those of transport officer,
housing officer or social worker (Lichte, 1996). As a result, the
rural psychologist is expected to be knowledgeable in general domains of
life (Kenardy & Griffiths, 1996). Moreover, there is a demand
for flexibility as the psychologist needs to adjust to unforeseen changes
and unexpected emergencies. To this end, although graduate
level psychology courses are mainly oriented to metropolitan practice,
academic programs are now increasingly being structured to include rural
practice issues and clinical psychology master students are encouraged/funded
to undertake rural placements/training to prepare them for the challenges
of rural psychology (Dollard, Shafik, & Court, in press). While
this is occurring in part, the expansion and continuation of such programs
is imperative.
Another area of concern for the rural psychologist is the difficulty
in accessing and purchasing psychological resources. Consequently,
there is a lack of certain resources such as basic psychometric assessment
tools, resource libraries, journals, test materials, computerised test
scoring programs and literature relating to common psychiatric diagnoses
and psychological complaints. Furthermore, there is also a lack
of appropriate assessment tools for indigenous people. Lichte (1996)
proposes increased “State or Commonwealth funding to maintain resource
development units targeting specific groups such as remote area practitioners
and indigenous populations” (p.38). It is predicted that the promotion,
sale and use of such materials should become self-sustaining. Requests
for specific resources can be met through local fund-raising.
The lack of opportunities (as well as lack of financial backing)
for ongoing clinical training/professional development such as educational
workshops and training courses is undoubtedly a further concern
to the rural psychologist especially if there is a need for the
acquisition of professional development (PD) points (Rolley &
Humphreys, 1993). Furthermore, the lack of peer support or
support programs could result in the psychologist becoming isolated
from developments in the field. One possible solution, recommended
by Lichte (1996), is for “greater APS involvement in supporting
rural and remote psychology, for example by providing occasional
workshops or conferences in distant locations and to encourage urban-based
psychologists to travel, who would thus gain greater awareness of
the difficulties some of their colleagues face”(p.41). Additionally,
the use of video or teleconferencing facilities as well as computerised
educational and treatment programs could become invaluable in this
area. The benefits and limitations of teleconferencing techniques
in providing support for mental health care have been demonstrated
by the South Australian Mental Health Services Telecommunication
Pilot Project (Kenardy & Griffiths, 1996). Videophones
capable of generating vision of both participants has obvious utility
for both client-psychologist and psychologist-professional support
relationships (Court, 2000). Technological innovations on
the internet, such as email, chat rooms, and the capacity for multi-user
domains, may also provide a modern solution to educational and social
isolation problems often experienced by rural psychologists.
They may also provide new tools for internet counselling and telepsychology
(Barak, 1999; Biggins, 1999). Some recent innovations include
an interactive CD-ROM to prepare psychologists, counsellors and
other health workers for practice in rural and remote locations,
and to enhance the understanding of rural psychological issues (Williams,
1999). The International Journal of Rural Psychology, an e-journal
recently launched in Australia (14th April 2000), aims to extend
its current web services to provide interactive support, as well
as a knowledge base, for state of the art practice in rural psychology.
Finally, the Bush Crisis Line, set up by Council of Remote Area
Nurses of Australia provides a 24 hour telephone debriefing and
counselling service for rural and remote health practitioners and
their families.
Education and training issues
for rural psychology students
University undergraduate psychology courses in Australia have certain
curriculum requirements as recommended by the Australian Psychological
Society (APS) and currently do not address practice issues (Dollard, Shafik
& Court, in press). Consequently, field experience and placements
usually occur only at the graduate level, and even then supervised placement
and employment opportunities are mainly metropolitan-based (Kenardy &
Griffiths, 1996).
With the base level of education being lifted from four to six years
to become an APS member from the year 2000, psychologists in rural and
remote areas who do not have access to supervision, training and professional
development requirements will be confronted with further challenges. In
an innovative response to these needs, the Charles Sturt University has
offered the Masters in Clinical Psychology degree as an external package,
the first of its kind in Australia, which will go some way toward
meeting the educational needs of rural psychologists.
A number of state government departments are addressing the issue
of continuing education by the active development of the technical infrastructure
required to provide teleconferencing to rural and remote settings.
Pertinent to the provision of such resources is the collaboration of stakeholders
such as APS, State and Commonwealth governments and tertiary institutions.
Most training programs for mental health professionals have been
geared implicitly or explicitly toward urban situations (Merwin, Goldsmith
& Manderscheid, 1995). Traditionally, preparation has been inadequate
for practice in rural and remote contexts mainly due to links not being
made between higher education and those involved in rural practice.
Graduate courses are now beginning to include curriculum components to
address rural issues (Dollard & Shafik, in press). Universities
need to confer with stakeholders such as the APS and state and federal
governments, and to consult with experienced rural psychologists in the
development of the curriculum for rural programs (Merwin, Goldsmith &
Manderscheid, 1995). In addition, the challenge exists to develop
and maintain placement and supervisory arrangements in rural and remote
settings. To this end, funding has been made available in Western
and South Australia, through the Rural Health Support, Education and Training
(RHSET) program to encourage students to seek such placements (Dollard,
Shafik & Court, in press). Finally, the State and Commonwealth
government can offer assistance to rural education and training of rural
psychologists on various levels. Universities can be assisted financially
in providing support for placements and other onsite training for rural
postgraduate students, or, alternatively, the use of private supervision
can be explored as an alternative to the government funded options.
Kenardy and Griffiths (1996) explain that past evidence exists that supervised
placements in rural settings do not necessarily result in continued practice
in such settings. Preliminary evaluation of the South Australian
internship project indicates that students undertaking rural internships
are more likely to consider rural employment opportunities (Dollard,
Shafik, & Court, in press). Indeed universities could do more
to target students with rural antecedents (eg childhood spent in rural
areas) to study psychology in the first instance, and/ or offer undergraduate
training in rural locations, both strategies shown in medical education
to increase the numbers of doctors who prefer to work in rural areas (see
Kassenbaum & Szenas, 1993; Magnus & Tollan, 1993).
Recruitment and retention of
psychologists in rural Australia
According to Griffiths and Andrews (1995) allowing for differences
between states, there are only 12% of all Australian psychologists who
were APS members, practising in rural and remote areas. However,
the recent census in South Australia (SA) (Farrin, Dollard & Court,
in press) estimated that only 6% of SA psychologists were practising in
rural areas. The shortage of rural psychologists according to Harvey and
Hodgson (1995), is due to such factors as lack of opportunity for spouse
employment, perceived lack of educational opportunities for children, especially
at secondary level, geographic and professional isolation, confidentiality
issues, limited employment opportunities, lack of supervision, lack of
opportunities for Professional Development points, high visibility and
comprehensive workload.
In a RHSET funded study investigating factors influencing recruitment,
Wolfenden, Blanchard and Probst (1994, 1996) found that the most important
reasons for psychologists being attracted to rural areas were employment
related as opposed to lifestyle preferences. Positive aspects include:
rural work challenges, opportunity to use their skills, scope and variety
of work, professional autonomy, and varied employment opportunity.
They argue that student rural placements need to be of an adequate duration
(not specified) for the student to experience and identify with the environment.
Recruitment of rural psychologists may be facilitated by fixed short term
rural employment coupled with future urban resettlement as an added incentive
(Wolfenden, 1996).
Low retention rates are particularly apparent for those using rural
employment as a stepping stone in their career paths. Retention is
influenced by lifestyle choices and personal factors. These include
physical environment, ease of travel, relaxed lifestyle and friendships
(Wolfenden, 1996). Orientation programs linking in with social, cultural
and sporting groups can be used to encourage a sense of community belonging.
Work practice autonomy and working conditions have also been identified
as influential in the retention of rural psychologists. According
to Wolfenden (1996) factors such as limited resources, lack of continuing
education and/or career development, heavy workload and limited leave relief
have all been identified as contributing to psychologists leaving rural
practice. Consequently, flexibility and freedom in the work combined
with organisational support on matters of working conditions are potent
factors for improving retention. Organisational structure promoting
possible career paths can provide a further incentive. Also to be
encouraged are professional peer and mentor support both at a face to face
level and through the use of telecommunication. Training scholarships could
be made contingent upon the student remaining in rural practice following
course completion. Appropriate support during the early career years
could be funded – this would include, access to training, high quality
locum systems, access to teleconference supervision, and the availability
of rural senior psychologist (Kenardy & Griffiths, 1996). Kenardy
and Griffiths (1996) further propose that the retention of new graduates
in rural settings could be enhanced by the provision of career structures
and financial incentives that equal those of their urban peers. Finally,
enhancing retention rate involves the provision of appropriate skills to
practice in rural settings – this includes not only the basic clinical
skills but also skills as broad as those required in community development,
and crisis intervention. In conclusion, further research needs to
be carried out to identify the needs of rural psychologists along with
the implementation of new recruitment and retention models based on research
findings.
Addressing the shortage of psychology
positions in rural and remote areas
Although the shortage of psychologists working in rural and remote
areas may be due to the psychologists’ own choice, it may be also due to
the lack of positions available (Griffith & Kenardy, 1996). Hill
(1996) has outlined a plan for a comprehensive strategy to successfully
promote the value of psychology and thus increase the number of psychology
positions in rural and remote areas. The strategy includes “selling”
the appropriateness of psychological services. This may include researching
the cost effectiveness of employing rural psychologists, lobbying State
and Commonwealth Health Ministers and Opposition Ministers on the value
of psychology, promoting the value of psychology to key rural and remote
identities such as rural general practitioners, and, defining specific
professional competencies for psychologists in rural areas. The strategy
also includes changes to education and training, such as incorporating
specialist subjects and placements in rural and remote Australia, facilitating
links between rural psychologists and experienced practitioners for mentorship
or supervision, using interactive communication technology for supervision
and professional development activities, improving accessibility of graduate
level training to rural psychologists, and, ensuring access to generalist
and specialist PD activities. Furthermore, the importance of taking
an active role in service delivery planning and in the development of mental
health policies is emphasised – this may include regular contact with State
and Commonwealth Health Departments involved in rural workforce planning,
ensuring representation on various rural health workforces, training and
professional committees and working parties, as well as facilitating greater
representation on APS working parties and committees. Finally, psychological
services may also be delivered by encouraging private practice to canvas
larger areas with the use of new technologies, and by up-skilling general
practitioners in assessment and preferred management of more common psychological
disorders.
The problems and issues highlighted above are not new. Therefore,
we argue that radical policy changes are required to achieve a critical
mass of rural psychologists in rural areas. Firstly, the APS Board,
through the Directorate of Standards and Training should consider making
the study of rural psychology, either as a full unit of study, or as a
significant research project, or as a rural placement (for example in the
Master of Clinical Psychology programs), a compulsory part of the training
of all Australian psychologists. This strategy needs to be coupled
with action by the State Psychology Registration Boards to require the
study of rural psychology, either as a full unit of study, as a significant
research project, or as a rural placement, as a requisite for registration.
Many psychology training programs in the US now include a rural component
(Gaddy, 1995). Court (in press) argues that "we need to learn from
this since our needs are so much more obvious than those in the US".
Current and recommended contributions
by psychological bodies to psychology in rural and remote area
The profile of rural psychology within the APS has improved with
some focused initiatives. First, the Rural and Remote Psychology
Interest Group has been established which assists in networking and rural
policy development. A very relevant parallel group has been also
been formed, the Indigenous Psychology Interest Group. Furthermore,
an official advisory group on regional, rural and remote issues has been
formed to address issues of inequities in education and support for rural
psychologists. Moreover, forums for the discussion of rural and remote
issues are now conducted at the APS conferences and discounts for APS members
for computer software and educational requirements are being considered.
An impressive role of the APS is in the development of position papers
on issues of social importance, such as the recent paper on mandatory sentencing
in Australia, and on reference manuals which are continuously revised such
as the Code of Ethics, and Guidelines on Professional Boundaries.
Griffiths and Kenardy (1996) further suggest several initiatives
that could be considered by the APS and the colleges in order to resolve
some rural and remote psychology issues. These include communication
with existing rural psychologists in order to assess their needs, such
as the assessment of the academic and professional concerns of rural psychologists
nationally, and the identification of specific types of professional development
(PD) and support favoured by rural mental health professionals. Additionally,
promotion of a nationally based rural network for psychologists could prove
invaluable, as could the conduct of a national rural psychology census.
This would provide a national database of psychologists, their interests,
areas of expertise and whether they are prepared to be considered as resource
personnel or mentors. A recent Rural Health Education and Support
Training program sought to link 20 rural and remote psychologists with
20 city based senior clinical psychologists in a mentorship program (Hunter
Institute of Mental Health, 1999). The project outcomes highlighted
the utility of professional support to rural practitioners.
This finding was supported in the recent census of psychologists in rural
and remote South Australia (Farrin, Dollard & Court, in press).
Nearly 40% of respondents identified the provision of peer support, mentoring,
and supervision as critical in the recruitment and retention of rural psychologists.
It is important that psychological bodies address issues of education
and training including on-going training, such as provision and promotion
of best practice models in rural and remote areas, and in liaison with
the Colleges of Psychiatrists. Moreover, significant attention must
be focused on developing recruitment and retention strategies as well as
educating communities regarding the benefits of employing psychologists.
Also to be considered are such matters as examining possible disadvantage
rural psychologists may experience in gaining and maintaining APS membership
and State Registration. Finally, psychological bodies should encourage
rural psychological research in order to build evidence based knowledge.
This could include research into the rural experience, prevalence
of behavioural and emotional disorders in rural areas, and psychological
services to Aboriginal clients.
Conclusion
In contemplating the future of rural psychology, three pertinent
issues need to be considered. Firstly, it has become increasingly
clear that development in the field is highly contingent upon the collaboration
of the major stakeholders, such as universities, psychological bodies and
national health organisations, in order to provide the rural psychologist
with consistent and pragmatic support in areas of education and training,
recruitment and retention and policy development. Secondly, the vital
role of research remains indisputable in advancing knowledge and in the
development of evidence-based models of practice especially where conflicting
information is apparent (Court & Dollard, in press). Finally,
the education of the rural population regarding the unique contribution
of psychology emerges as a potential major catalyst for the encouragement
of help-seeking behaviour. The discipline of psychology is clearly
faced with maintaining a commitment to addressing these issues and overcoming
any related challenges that may present as a hindrance to the promotion
of accessibility, availability and acceptability of psychological services
for residents of rural and remote Australia.
In conclusion, to overcome the ongoing issues in the practice of
Australian rural and remote psychology we believe some parallel radical
policy changes are required. Firstly, the APS Board, through the
Directorate of Standards and Training should consider making the study
of rural psychology, either as a full unit of study, or as a significant
research project, or as a rural placement (for example in the Master of
Clinical Psychology) a compulsory component of the training of all Australian
psychologists. This strategy needs to be coupled with action by the
State Psychology Registration Boards to require the study of rural psychology,
either as a full unit of study, as a significant research project, or as
a rural placement as a compulsory requirement for registration.
Psychology has a major role to play in the improvement of health
and mental health of rural Australians, but a major problem for the profession
is a lack of critical mass in the bush. This could be remedied by
forcing the universities, through the policy shifts as outlined above,
to provide a means for students to study issues in rural psychology, thereby
improving the chances of students wishing to take up rural appointments.
Beyond health, psychology in Australia is in a good position to lead in
the development of niche areas of new knowledge and practice, in rural
forensic psychology and rural work psychology.
References
Australian Health Ministers’ Conference. (1999). Healthy
Horizons, 1999-2003. A framework for improving the health of rural,
regional, and remote Australians. Canberra: Australian Government
Publications Service.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (1994). Australia’s
Health 1994: The Fourth Biennial Health Report of the Australian Institute
Health and Welfare. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the Internet:
A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Applied and Preventive
Psychology, 8, 231-246.
Blank, M. B., Fox, J. C., Hargrove, D. S. & Turner, J. T.
(1995). Critical issues in reforming mental health service delivery.
Community Mental Health Journal, 31, 511-523.
Biggins, N. (1999). Telepsychology. PhD Dissertation.
Flinders University of South Australia.
Bushy, A. (1994). When your client lives in a rural area
, part II: Rural Professional Practice -Considerations for nurses providing
mental health care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 15, 267-276.
Commonwealth of Australia. (1993). National Mental Health
Policy. Australian Health Ministers Conference, April 1992. Canberra,
ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Commonwealth of Australia. (1994). National Rural Health
Strategy. Australian Health Ministers Conference. Canberra,
ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Court, J. (in press). Rural psychology: New possibilities.
In, M. F. Dollard, J. Farrin, & P. Munn Eds. Rural Psychology, Volume
II, Proceedings of the 4th Regional Australia Conference, Whyalla, South
Australia.
Court, J. & Dollard, M. F. (2000). Australian Rural Psychology
– paradigm shifting. International Journal of Rural Psychology, www.ruralpsych.com
Dollard, M. F., Shafik, S. & Court, J. (in press).
Rural psychology and education: Rural internships for clinical psychologists.
In, M. F. Dollard, J. Farrin, & P. Munn Eds. Rural Psychology, Volume
II, Proceedings of the 4th Regional Australia Conference, Whyalla, South
Australia.
Farrin, J., Dollard, M. F. & Court, J. (in press).
A census
of rural and remote South Australian psychologists. In, M. F. Dollard,
J. Farrin, & P. Munn Eds. Rural Psychology, Volume II, Proceedings
of the 4th Regional Australia Conference, Whyalla, South Australia.
Dunn, P. (1996). Leaving much to the imagination: Rural
and remote psychology services. In R. Griffiths, P. Dunn & S. Ramanathan
(Eds.). Psychology Services in Rural and Remote Australia: Issues
Paper (pp. 9-16). Canberra: Australian Rural Health Research Institute.
Dunn, P., Buchanan, E. & Kerr, R. (1994). Health
and Health Care of an Inland Rural Community. Charles Sturt University.
Wagga, Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research.
Faulkner , K .K. & Faulkner, T. A. (1997). Managing
multiple relationships in rural communities: Neutrality and Boundary Violations.
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 225-234.
Gaddy, C. D. (1995). Psychology training programs offering
rural focus double in the past decade. Rural Health Bulletin, 2,
3.
Griffiths, S. (1996). Issues in rural health: The utilisation
and perception of psychological services. In R. Griffiths, P. Dunn &
S. Ramanathan (Eds.). Psychology Services in Rural and Remote Australia:
Issues Paper (pp. 17-24). Canberra: Australian Rural Health Research
Institute.
Griffiths, R. & Kenardy, J. (1996). Role of psychological
bodies for psychological services in rural and remote areas. In R.
Griffiths, P. Dunn & S. Ramanathan (Eds.). Psychology Services in Rural
and Remote Australia: Issues Paper (pp. 17-24). Canberra: Australian Rural
Health Research Institute.
Griffiths, S. & Andrews, H. (1995). Issues in rural
and remote psychological practice. Proceedings of the 30th Annual
Australian Psychological Society Conference. Australian Journal of
Psychology, 47 (80), Supplement.
Harvey, D. & Hodgson, J. (1995). New directions for
research and practice in psychology in rural areas. Australian Psychologist,
30, 196-199.
Hill, C. (1996). The future of psychology services in regional Australian.
In R. Griffiths, P. Dunn & S. Ramanathan (Eds.). Psychology Services
in Rural and Remote Australia: Issues Paper (pp. 49-52). Canberra: Australian
Rural Health Research Institute.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (1993).
Human Rights and Mental Illness: Report of the National Inquiry into the
Human Rights of People with Mental Illness. Vol. 2. Canberra, ACT:
Australian Government Publishing Service.
Humphreys, J. & Rolley, F. (1991). Health and Health
Care in Rural Australia. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.
Kassebaum, D. G., & Szenas, P. L. (1993). Rural sources
of medical students, and graduates' choice of rural practice. Academic
Medicine, 68, 232-236.
Kenardy, J & Griffiths, R. (1996). Education and
training for rural psychologists. In R. Griffiths, P. Dunn & S. Ramanathan
(Eds.). Psychology Services in Rural and Remote Australia: Issues Paper
(pp. 31-36). Canberra: Australian Rural Health Research Institute.
Lichte, C. (1996). The delivery of psychology services
in rural and remote Australia. In R. Griffiths, P. Dunn & S.
Ramanathan (Eds.). Psychology Services in Rural and Remote Australia: Issues
Paper (pp. 37-42). Canberra: Australian Rural Health Research Institute.
Magnus, J. H., & Tollan, A. (1993). Rural doctor recruitment:
Does medical education in rural districts recruit doctors to rural areas?
Medical Education, 27, 250-253.
Merwin, E. I., Goldsmith, H. F. & Manderscheid, R. W. (1995).
Human resource issues in rural mental health services. Community
Mental Health Journal, 31, 525-537.
Rolley, F. & Humphreys, J. S. (1993). Rural welfare
– the human face of Australia’s countryside, In T. Sorensen and R. Epps
(Eds.). Prospects and Policies for Rural Australia. Melbourne,
Victoria: Longman Cheshire.
Sargent, M. & Gregory, G. (1980). Rural Health Issues.
ARAU Bulletin No1. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.
Schank, J. A. & Skovholt, T. M. (1997). Dual-relationship
dilemmas of rural and small-community psychologists. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 44-49.
Sears, S. F., Evan, G. D. & Perry, N.W. (1998). Innovations
in training: The University of Florida Rural Psychology Program.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 504-507.
Wilson-Barratt, E., & Dollard, M. F. (in press). Dual relationship
dilemmas. In, M. F. Dollard, J. Farrin, & P. Munn Eds. Rural Psychology,
Volume II, Proceedings of the 4th Regional Australia Conference, Whyalla,
South Australia.
Welch, R. (1994). Identifying health needs in rural communities.
In D. McSwan and M. McShane (Eds.), Conference Proceedings, Issues Affecting
Rural Communities (p. 94-99). Townsville: James Cook University
of North Queensland.
Wolfenden, K. (1996). Enhancing opportunities: Recruitment
and retention. In R. Griffiths, P. Dunn & S. Ramanathan (Eds.).
Psychology Services in Rural and Remote Australia: Issues Paper (pp. 31-36).
Canberra: Australian Rural Health Research Institute.
Wolfenden, K., Blanchard, P. & Probst, D. (1994).
Rural information for mental health staff: Project report.
Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health.
Wolfenden, K., Blanchard, P. & Probst, D. (1996).
Recruitment and retention – Perceptions of rural mental health workers.
Australian Journal Rural Health, 4, 89-95.
Yellowlees, P. M. & Kaushik, A. V. (1992). The Broken
Hill psychopathology project. Australian and New Zealand Journal
of Psychiatry, 26, 197-207.
Yuen, E., Gerdes, J. & Gonzales, J. (1996). Patterns
of rural mental health care: An exploratory study. General Hospital
Psychiatry, 18.
|