.
International Journal of Rural Psychology
ISSN 1444-2166
Archived Abstracts 2003


Mental Health and Fatigue of Sheep Farmers Exposed to Organophosphate Pesticides
C.A. Jackson PhD, A. Spurgeon PhD, and K. Gardiner PhD (15 April 2003)
Refereed Report, Members Only

Abstract
To investigate the role of low level pesticide exposure and psychosocial factors in the health of English sheep farmers, mental health and fatigue were assessed in 259 farmers exposed to organophosphate pesticides (OPs) while dipping sheep, at least 28 days after exposure. Of exposed farmers, 38% showed mental health problems and 44% displayed severe fatigue. Of farmers reporting no exposure, incidence was 27% and 40% respectively. Risk of developing case-qualifying mental health and severe fatigue scores (as measured by the GHQ and CFS respectively) were slightly raised in the exposed farmers (odds ratios 1.67 and 1.19 respectively) when compared with non-exposed farmers. However, the number of mental health and severe fatigue cases across the exposed and no exposure groups were not significant (p = 0.43 and p = 0.89 respectively). Case-qualifying scores were considered to represent probable cases of psychological distress and severe fatigue. Relationships between long term OP exposure, mental health and fatigue were non significant (p = 0.55 and p = 0.95 respectively). Regression models showed three variables (stressful life events, agricultural satisfaction and handling sheep within 48 hours of dipping) were significant in prediction of mental health; exposure to spray from the dip bath while dipping and mental health were significant factors in prediction of fatigue. Farmers who reported excessive spray rising from the dip bath were three times as likely to rated themselves ill. Results support a biopsychosocial model of response to hazard exposure, as illness appeared to be explained by the interplay of physical and psychosocial factors rather than any single neurotoxicological, physiological or psychological cause.


Please Note:
Access the full version of refereed articles, reports and research notes is restricted to members only. Please subscribe to IJRP if you wish to access these.  All other areas have free public access.
If it's not on, is it still on?
A model of condom use for rural Australian adolescents.
Megan E Jenkins and Suzanne McLaren (November 2003)
Abstract
Recent research indicates that rural Australian adolescents experience a number of barriers to their health, and in particular, their sexual health. Consequently, the present study aimed to examine levels of sexual health knowledge, sexual activity, condom use and attitudes towards condoms in a rural, adolescent population. In addition, the research tested a comprehensive model of condom use. One hundred and thirty six 15 to 19 year old students, 51 males (M age = 16.75, SD =.74 ) and 85 females (M age = 16.73, SD = .85), from schools in five towns of population not more than 6000 residents completed a survey package that included demographic information, a Sexual Health Knowledge Scale, the Condom Attitudes Scale and the Adolescent and Young Adult contraceptive Self-efficacy Scale. Results indicated that overall knowledge levels were low, with males knowing significantly less than females. Sixty-five percent of the participants had engaged in sexual intercourse, with over half of those reporting being inconsistent users or non-users of condoms. Within the context of the model, knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and intention to use condoms, all contributed to predicting condom use. Results suggest that rural adolescents require education and assistance to obtain and use condoms in a non-threatening environment.